Compare Rubic vs StarkWare Bridges providers

This page compares Rubic and StarkWare across Bridges provider data, including plan type, API type, chain, pricing, technology, available APIs, limitations, security features, monitoring, regions, and documentation links where available.

Compared providers: Rubic, StarkWare.

33 providers and 33 plans to compare
33
Offer
Chain
TX Speed SLA
Throughput SLA
Technology
Open Source
Support
Available APIs
Monitoring & Analytics
Additional Features
Asset Types
Price
Economical Security
Economical Security Note
Audits Performed
Decentralization
SDK
Supported Chains
Tags
Minimize Sidebar
Rubic
mainnet
Bridge Aggregator
Yes
Discord
Bridge API, Swap API
15k+ tokens, 100+ chains supported
ETH, ERC‑20
Depends on underlying bridge
Yes
JS SDK, Web UI
polygon, bnb chain, tron, unichain, bitcoin, solana, base, arbitrum, ethereum, linea, optimism, zksync era, ton, avalanche, berachain, blast, scroll, morph, fraxtal, soneium, mode, mantle, metis, manta pacific, fantom, zkevm, pulsechain, taiko, hemi, filecoin, x layer, bahamut, dash, monero, cardano, cosmos, litecoin, xrp ledger, aptos, polkadot, stellar, near, zilliqa, tezos, xdc, kava cosmos, neo, gnosis, flare
BridgeDocs
StarkWare
mainnet
Native L1↔L2 Token Bridge
Yes
Email, Bridge UI
Deposit, Withdrawal
Starknet Messaging, ETH & ERC-20 Support
ETH, ERC-20
Gas Fee
Yes
Starknet Audits
Partially Decentralized
Cairo
ethereum, bitcoin, solana
Bridge
chain.love

chain.love

LinkedInXTelegramGitHub
DocumentationWhitepaper

©2024-2026 CHAIN.LOVE