Compare Trezor (via MetaMask) vs Wigwam Wallets providers

This page compares Trezor (via MetaMask) and Wigwam across Wallets provider data, including plan type, API type, chain, pricing, technology, available APIs, limitations, security features, monitoring, regions, and documentation links where available.

Compared providers: Trezor (via MetaMask), Wigwam.

52 providers and 53 plans to compare
52
Offer
Open Source
Supported Platforms
Custodial
MFA
MSIG
Hardware
Key Export
Native
EVM
Tendermint
Tokens Support
Staking
Price
Support
Audit Info
Languages
Tags
Minimize Sidebar
Trezor (via MetaMask)
No
Hardware
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-1155
No
Paid
email, helpdesk
regular audits
EN
Website
Wigwam
Yes
iOS, Android, Web, Desktop
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
ERC-20, ERC-721
No
$0
email, help guides
January 2024 by Halborn
EN, ES, FR, IT, JA, KO, RU, UK, ZH
Website
chain.love

chain.love

LinkedInXTelegramGitHub
DocumentationWhitepaper

©2024-2026 CHAIN.LOVE